Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 1041 - 1060 of 6,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2008, 2:07 pm
In USA v Shi, the Ninth Circuit ruled that there is no "nexus"requirement in a prosecution for acts of violence on the high seas. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Its position is that it operates in accordance with the laws of the USA and that, since it is not a publisher of Blogger under US law, it will only take down libellous material which is the subject of a court decision. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Taking these two positions as starting points, the paper identifies how courts produce spatial justice, drawing on a case study, the decision by the European Court of Human Rights, Rael v Switzerland (2012). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 2008 WL 5216255, *11–*12 (SD Cal., Aug. 11, 2008). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in the patent case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 5:00 pm by Simon Lester
Article: Epistemic Contests and Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization: The Brazil – USA Cotton Dispute and Incremental Balancing of Global Interests, 4(1) Trade, L. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:57 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Nelson & Others v The City Council of Bluff, Iowa: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, case number 21-3794 (10 November 2022) [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am by Tucker Chambers
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
While the legal risk in some jurisdictions, such as the USA, is lower, applicable gambling laws in other jurisdictions may already cover loot boxes (for example, Poland).In many jurisdictions, loot boxes are not only subject to an increased legal risk but also to a significant enforcement risk. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Walter Haines, Esq.
Henshaw and Souza v Home Depot USA Inc. is a California class actions alleging that not all accrued vacation time was paid out upon termination of employment. [read post]