Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 7,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
Thus, for example, in Thompson v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am
Concern that prisoners were being tortured to death was at the heart of the landmark 2008 Supreme Court case Baze v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:39 pm
In answering (v) and (vi), the examiner should seek the advice of his manager in consultation with local counsel. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm
Texas previously was obliged to get such approval under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but that regime ended with the Supreme Court’s ruling in June in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
Before making some general observations about Charlie Savage's new book Takeover, I want to say that this is one of the best journalistic accounts concerning presidential power (a topic difficult to explain to a lay audience) published in a long time. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:08 am
Supreme Court ruled under a case call Arizona v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:28 am
Tweedy, “Unjustifiable Expectations: Laying to Rest Allotment-Era Settlers,” 36 Seattle U. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Can., 1992-03-26), SOQUIJ AZ-92111050, J.E. 92-517, [1992] 1 R.C.S. 771 — mesure transitoire exceptionnelle — état du droit tel qu’il existait — complexité de l’affaire — opérations frauduleuses — fraude — plus de 1 million de dollars — événement distinct — délai institutionnel — district judiciaire — délai raisonnable. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:47 am
Take for instance the case of Christina Viernun v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Current rules give unfair advantage to mass-litigation attorneys targeting Texas consumersLabeau v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
If you thought you had an ugly divorce, you may reconsider after hearing about Nozolino v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:40 am
InPerelson Weiner, LLP v Allison NY Slip Op 2010 31679 06/29/2010 Supreme Court, New York County, Goodman, J. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:15 pm
Now, more than 40 years after the landmark Fifth Circuit Borel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
In Kaufman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:19 am
After laying out the dispute's factual background and outlining each state's basic arguments, the Court - in an opinion by Justice Alito - proceeded to sidestep nearly all of them, including the entirety of both sides' statutory and constitutional arguments. [read post]
