Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 pm
Lord Abbett Mun. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
State. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
In adopting this new defense, Canada followed the lead of the then-House of Lords in England, which had transformed English defamation law in 2006 and 1999 decisions by embracing the "responsible journalism" defense.Ever since New York Times v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Lord Carnwath stated that there is nothing to rule out consideration of mitigation measures at the EIA screening stage, but the Directive and the Regulations expressly envisage that they will where appropriate be included in the environmental statement. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
Lord Neuberger was particularly keen that experimental policies not be deterred: para [97]. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
They also referred his case to the Secretary of State with a view to him being barred from working with children. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Notwithstanding the clear terms of section 33(1), after the commencement of the 2009 Act, courts either continued to apply the pre-Act line of authority commencing with the judgment of Lord Coleridge in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, or at least to interpret section 33(1) through the lens of those cases. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am
On 19 May 2011 Lord Stoneham asked a question in Parliament on behalf of Lord Oakeshott identifying Sir Fred Goodwin as the person who had obtained the injunction. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
On 11 February Lord Justice Warby handed down judgment on the summary judgment application in the case of HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch). [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
