Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 1041 - 1060 of 42,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Robert Schaffer
’s (“Apple”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) after finding no reasonable juror could have found infringement based on the evidence presented during the liability phase of trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 6:42 am by Carolina Attorneys
Under the rules of evidence in North Carolina, the Trier of Fact is responsible for listening to the testimony presented and deciding what happened. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 9:57 am
[JURIST] Afghan officials said Sunday they were preparing to release a man possibly facing the death penalty for converting to Christianity from Islam after a judge sent the case of Abdul Rahman [Wikipedia profile] back to prosecutors, ruling that he lacked enough evidence to proceed. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today affirmed a district court’s ruling denying Innovation Sciences’ post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that claims of three of its patents are not invalid and that Amazon.com, Inc. infringed them, or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm by Steven Langer
“However, when the evidence is looked at as a whole in this matter, in its entirety, it is clear this exceeds business as usual. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today affirmed a district court’s ruling denying Innovation Sciences’ post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that claims of three of its patents are not invalid and that Amazon.com, Inc. infringed them, or, alternatively, a new trial. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:03 am by Denise Erlich
The post Sometimes Fault Matters in a No-Fault Divorce State appeared first on Erlich Law Office. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:49 pm by Larry
[Note: I realize that seems self-evident, but that's the fact of the matter.]Consequently, in this case, all of the goods, when re-entering the U.S. after further processing abroad, qualify for the partial duty exemption. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
From our man/woman in court:MORE UPDATES :Tibbett, Davis' Rule 3 attorney is questioning Barrar , Davis' trial attorney if Barrar should have called a Miami-Dade County supervisor as a witness. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:53 am by Paul Cartwright
 The court highlighted the following principles in the assessment of evidence by expert witnesses: As a general rule, courts, not expert witnesses, must determine issues of fact. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:40 am by Hanlon Law, PA
As a result, the court affirmed the trial court ruling in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its rulings. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:40 am by Hanlon Law, PA
As a result, the court affirmed the trial court ruling in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its rulings. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Li violated the New Jersey Rules of ProfessionalConduct by taking possession of client funds he knew tobe disputed. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:25 am by Steve Kalar
  The Federal Rules of Evidence cannot be used as both a sword and a shield. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ultimately, the Boardconcluded that Appellees provided “strong evidence ofobviousness. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, the board holds that the publication dates indicated on documents D1, D3, and D14 published by the ETSI 3GPP organisation, which is regarded as a reputable standardisation body having clear and reliable rules for their publications (see the cited FAQ page information above), can be considered to have a high probative value and thus may serve as prima-facie evidence that those documents and their contents were published on the date indicated.[2.3.3] Accordingly, the board… [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 11:34 am by Jeff DeFrancisco
The trial court agreed that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law and dismissed the plaintiff’s malpractice and informed consent claims. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:57 pm
However in this case the Court states, "Though the Federal Rules of Evidence do not specifically so state, prior misconduct of a witness which is probative of the bias of that witness may be proved by extrinsic evidence. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am by zshapiro
To allow the use of illegally seized evidence to convict a citizen or an alien for that matter only encourages illegal action and discredits the rule of law. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
Why does the characterization of the DAG letter as a rule or just guidance matter? [read post]