Search for: "Marks v. Howe" Results 1041 - 1060 of 14,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2008, 12:50 am
  An interesting question, and unanswered question,  is how these non-taxed expenses should be treated for support purposes. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
March 2 marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gibbons v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
Mark Thomson has accused the media of self-interest in their reporting of the mis-named “super-injunctions ” scandal. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
This occurred earlier today in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, where Mr Justice Arnold gave his ruling in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2012] EWHC 3345 (Ch). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
Trump, 87 F. 4th 1, 13 (CADC 2023) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Fitzgerald, 457 U. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
Mark and my presentation fleshed out the pro’s and con’s of these two salvage tools and highlighted a number of judicial decisions from the last 15-20 years that illustrate how the assignment clause has increasingly found favor with the courts. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:18 am
"The Board concluded that the applied-for mark immediately conveys an attribute of applicant's wine, and therefore it is merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1).Failure to Function: "The critical question in determining whether a designation functions as a mark is how the designation would be perceived by the relevant public. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:53 am
The main issue in the controversy: how wide is the scope of protection for trade marks with a low level of distinctiveness? [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:53 am by Jocelyn Bosse
CopyrightEleonora Rosati also announced an event to discuss the judgment of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
Merpel suggests it depends on how much vodka. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Contrasting this with US tort liability for contributory and vicarious infringement, Martin demonstrated how far EU doctrine extended beyond it. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a… [read post]