Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 9,176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Well, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the District Court’s well-crafted opinion in Tibble v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Cruise ship employees' employment contracts are "considered as commercial" under Title 9 of the United States Code. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The unit’s occupant had paid his past due balance weeks before the sale, but the system incorrectly listed the unit as delinquent and marked it to be sold. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
In yesterday’s post, I mentioned that the Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission on California State Government Organization and the Economy oversees the Bureau of State Audits. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am
How could it be widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
" Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
United States, in which it is considering the mens rea requirement for federal narcotics cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
L’Oréal has identified various forms of infringement, including, inter alia, the sale and offer for sale, to consumers in the EU, of goods bearing L’Oréal’s trade marks intended, by L’Oréal, for sale in third States (parallel importation).The High Court (United Kingdom), before which the dispute is pending, has asked the Court of Justice a number of questions concerning the obligations to which a company operating an internet… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
A couple of interesting dissents filed today in a denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
It was stated that the mark is a two-dimensional figurative mark that consists of a red coloured surface. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
