Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm
Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:27 am
Circuit Court case, Frye v United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:33 am
” The aforementioned BRL also recognizes considerable efficiencies in licensing vehicles and notes that the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Guidelines state that field-of-use restrictions, such as licensing at the end-product level, can be procompetitive.⁷End-device-based royalty rate determination. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Mark Mazzetti and David D. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, 174 U. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:41 pm
In that case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
" (United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:12 am
By Mark S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
While the law is complicated, the facts in the Janus case are fairly simple: Mark Janus is an employee of the State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, and employees of that agency are exclusively represented by the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Council 31. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Photo from Arizona Game and Fish Department *** The Wilderness Society v. [read post]
