Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1041 - 1060
of 16,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2007, 9:29 am
[The IPKat reckons that, as a matter of theory, this is correct, thanks to the global appreciation approach. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am
Whether it shines a light on true issues may not matter as much. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
Of note The Board rejected this argument, explaining that “[t]he mark must [] be regarded as a whole, including the disclaimed matter, in evaluating similarity to other marks. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm
” It was still a coined term, and Pitbull didn’t show that lots of other sellers are actually using Athlet- prefixed marks for athletic apparel or goods. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm
Of course don’t forget if you have ANY legal matters you need handled make sure to contact me at www.amberlawfirm.com. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
Thus, the §32 claim failed as a matter of law. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:40 pm
“We will never know, and it doesn’t matter, if this conspiracy was the difference-maker in a close election,” said prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, when trial began. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:22 pm
The Section 2(a) deceptive matter bar should "kick out" and prevent registration of some of the more misleading marks. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:44 am
But if that design or process is commonly known in the industry, it isn’t actually secret and won’t be protected under trade secret law. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Study: 2/3 of marks that applied for renewal couldn’t show use in one or all categories. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Moreover, it is unknown whether this document was indeed made available to clients without there being any obligation of secrecy and whether it has been sent to the clients at all.The arguments made in respect of document D2 also apply to document D13 in an analogous way.[1.3.3] As far as the decisions T 804/05, T 743/89 and T 55/01 are concerned, the Board is of the following opinion:Decision T 804/05 dealt with the public availability of an advertising leaflet,… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus under the present circumstances, the board considers that by admitting the main request the proceedings are not delayed nor the other party can be considered to be taken by surprise. [2.6] The appellant opponent further argued that it was not clear what exactly the proprietor’s main request was, since the appellant proprietor had submitted amended description pages 1a and 2a which were marked “For all requests”, i.e. apparently also for the main request. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:54 am
Further, the Board noted that “FINCA,” which translates to “VINEYARD,” is highly descriptive in its association with wine and “[i]t is well-settled that disclaimed, descriptive matter may have less significance in likelihood of confusion determinations. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
” Thus, use of his name in small text as part of a description of the product wouldn’t be use as a mark, whereas putting his name in larger text than the name of the new brand would be. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:24 pm
Mark Madoff’s body was actually found by legendary litigator Martin London, a longtime partner at the firm who is now of counsel at PW.As noted on his Paul Weiss website bio, “[t]he gamut of Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Moreover, the [opponent] had arguments concerning a lack of inventive step of the claimed subject-matter, based on documents that were already part of the proceedings. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
It also doesn’t matter whether, at the time of filing, that applicant had no economic activity corresponding to the goods and services referred to in that application. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
So why shouldn’t we worry? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
The answer to that question is, probably not – but it doesn’t matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 6:06 am
However an applicant would be entitled to produce documents proving the accuracy or inaccuracy of a matter of common knowledge. [read post]
