Search for: "P Plaintiff"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 13,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2008, 12:55 am
When commencing a medical malpractice lawsuit in New York State, plaintiffs, and especially, plaintiff’s attorneys, must be aware of the necessity of filing a proper and timely Notice of Claim where applicable, or they may forever lose the ability to bring suit. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
There was no evidence that the “distinctiveness” or perceived value of Pom’s mark would likely be affected negatively by Hubbard’s use of “pūr pŏm,” including no evidence that consumers’ association of the POM mark with Pom Wonderful had weakened since pūr pŏm entered the market or that other companies had attempted to market pomegranate beverages under “pom” in the more than two years… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
”G.S. certainly landed an icy reception there ....# # #DECISIONS. v EFG & P, LLC [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 2:28 pm
Huggins, supra, 15 Cal. at p. 132.) [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
” Plaintiffs asked that the Court compel Vigilant to comply with P. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:27 am
Plaintiff sued the dog’s owner for damages. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 3:22 pm
CONTRIBUTED BY David P. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
The plaintiff, Innovative Health Solutions (IHS) sells a medical device called P-STIM. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" As the State Education Department explicitly recognized that school leaders have “[r]esponsibilty for the . . . performance evaluation of certified personnel” and still concluded that “[P]laintiffs’ respective . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" As the State Education Department explicitly recognized that school leaders have “[r]esponsibilty for the . . . performance evaluation of certified personnel” and still concluded that “[P]laintiffs’ respective . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:23 pm
Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647, 320 P.2d 16, 65 A.L.R.2d 1358 and Lucas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647, 320 P.2d 16, 65 A.L.R.2d 1358 and Lucas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
The judge overseeing the case is John P. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:51 pm
P. 23, the final requirement under the PSLRA.The district court rejected another plaintiff’s request to be appointed as a co-lead plaintiff, finding that the appointment of co-counsel would detract from the PSLRA’s fundamental goal of client control of securities class actions.Finally, consistent with the PSLRA, the court accepted the California Group’s selection of class counsel. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:30 pm
P. 54(c), which states that federal courts should grant the relief to which each party is entitled, even if the party has not demanded that relief in its pleadings. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
Soven and Timothy P. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm
The Court therefore does not find Plaintiff’s ’264 pa- tent to be invalid for anticipation or obviousness.Summary Judgment, slip op. at 16. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:21 am
” However, plaintiffs provided only an unauthenticated website screen shot. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:16 pm
The Plaintiff was 25 at the time of the BC car crash. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:45 pm
Moser, 339 P. 3d 344, the court had before it a medical malpractice case involving three separate defendants: a doctor, a hospital, and a medical product manufacturer. [read post]
