Search for: "Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer)" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
 The IPKat has stumbled across a decision earlier this year from the Federal Court, Canada, in Pfizer Canada Inc. v Pharmascience Inc. 2013 FC 120, dating back to 4 February. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
Pfizer Inc., 2009 WL 3230611, at *8 (W.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Squibb & Sons, Inc., 682 P.2d 832, 835 (Utah 1984).Virginia: Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
But if this possibility automatically requires that all be joined, the rule that joint tortfeasors are not by virtue of their jointness indispensable parties . . . would be overthrown"Canon, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Just north of Merck's Rahway site on US 1 is the now abandoned site of Exxon's Corporate Research Laboratory. 24/7WallSt , comparing Merck and Pfizer, discussed the patent issue: Differences between the two companies is most evident in the strategic measures the big pharma players seem to be taking to meet challenges arising from the expiration of key patents and the rise of generic competition.(...) [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:54 am
Now, four years after that decision gave Susette Kelo's land to private developers for a project including a hotel and offices intended to enhance Pfizer Inc.'s nearby corporate facility, the pharmaceutical giant has announced it will close its research and development headquarters in New London, Connecticut. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:01 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 18/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:52 am
Insignia further identifies the following entities to which false and misleading statements were made, including but not necessarily limited to: Georgia Pacific; White Wave; Ocean Spray; McCain; Solo Cup; Hormel; Kraft; Ryan Multifoods / Ryan Partnership; Pfizer, Dreyer's; Kellogg's; Dial; Chef America / Nestle; Nabisco; Campbell's; Sorrento; B & G Foods; Colgate; Church & Dwight; Pinnacle Foods; Procter & Gamble; SC Johnson; Tyson's; General… [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 7:30 am
Robert Temple, director of the FDA's Offices of Drug Evaluation, said his agency is "not particularly worried" about Dostinex:The two studies, published in January in the New England Journal of Medicine, also tied another Parkinson's drug, Pfizer Inc.'s Dostinex, or cabergoline, to heart-valve problems. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 09/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:57 pm by Apeng
(FOSS Patents) (IP Watch) (TechnoLlama) (IPBiz) Apple files suit against Samsung over alleged copying of ‘look and feel’ of iPhone and iPad – Apple Inc. v. [read post]