Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:08 am
The doctrine of continuous representation tolled the statute of limitations at least until that date (see Sommers v Cohen, 14 AD3d 691, 692-693; Gaslow v Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon, 286 AD2d 703, 706; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 169-170). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix Chambers.
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a series of joined cases concerning extradition and the rights of children including KAS or H v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0217, BH v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0210 , F-K (FC) v Polish Judicial Authority UKSC 2012/0039, R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0128 and R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0129. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
Attorney General and White House Counsel (and former Texas Supreme Court justice) Alberto Gonzalez has been hired by a special master to help him in the DataTreasury Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:02 am by Charon QC
Useful reading: On Sedley v Sumption, here’s Sumption’s FA Mann lecture from last year: Sedley’s LRB article in response Whigs and Hunters. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 11:06 am by Aimee Hess
The San Antonio Court of Appeals addressed the issue of fixed versus floating royalties in the case of Leal v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court on Friday morning released this order directing the parties in Hall Street Assoc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As such, “tribes possess the common-law immunity traditionally enjoyed by sovereign powers” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d 157, 170 [2d Cir]). [read post]