Search for: "Ray v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
A subsequent post will set out in more detail the impact this decision has on the state of the law. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:34 am by Ray Dowd
Image from http://www.ivi.tv/ viewed 3/13/2010In WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc. 10 Civ. 715(SDNY Feb 22, 2010), Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald granted a preliminary injunction under the Second Circuit's standard set forth in Salinger v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Legal Beagle
” The Scottish Government’s Press Release on the bill, from earlier this week stated : Tough new laws on sectarian and offensive behaviour Bigots will face five year jail terms Tough new laws to crack down on sectarian and other forms of hatred in Scotland should be in place in time for the new football season after Ministers introduced a draft Bill to the Scottish Parliament. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by cdw
I would be remiss for not noting that the Sixth Circuit has released an unusually large number of opinions in the last week, all denying relief: Donald Ray Middlebrooks v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
., John Thomas (2003), Arti Rai (2003), Tim Holbrook (2003), Craig Nard (1995), and much of the briefing in Teva v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:25 pm
  Which is fine for mommies, but less so for federal judges, as today’s (very short) case illustrates.In Fay v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm by Jack Pringle
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]