Search for: "Samples v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
So the populations of case opinions that can be found in repositories such as Westlaw, Lexis, Casemaker, Justia, or Google Scholar, are not a representative sample of the universe of cases.And as for the precedent-setting cases in the state supreme court, they were and continue to be hand-picked because courts of last resort exercise discretionary review and their active docket (granted petitions are denominated "causes" in the SCOTX lingo) is anything but a random… [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2014)(quoting Alza Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In response to a demand for certain records involving the activities and conduct of correction officers, the Appellate Division said that its in camera review of a sampling of the requested documents in unredacted form "reveals that the factual description of events contained in the reports was 'neutral and did not contain any invidious implications capable facially of harassment or degradation of the officer in a courtroom'. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:56 am by Bryan Hawkins
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Scott Bomboy
The primary constitutional question debated at the Court on Tuesday in Department of Commerce v. [read post]