Search for: "Smith v. Burden" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,949
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
” Summary judgment for the county was affirmed on the employee’s retaliation claim (Davis v Fort Bend County, August 26, 2014, Prado, E). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:29 am
Davis, 427 F.3d 197, 212 n.14 (3rd Cir.2005) (“[V]ideotaping or photographing the police in the performance of their duties on public property may be protected activit[ies]”); Smith v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
The following is a guest post from Reed Smith’s Rachel Weil. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am by Schachtman
Smith Corp., Circuit Court of Illinois, Third Judicial Circuit (Dec. 22, 2004). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
 The judge then explained that Enjaianhas not met this burden. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  That is simply not how the Court resolved free exercise claims in the generation preceding Smith. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The leading example of a successful exceptions claim in the pre-Smith period was Sherbert v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, in its opinion the Court majority acknowledged once more that "[i]t is certainly true that in applying RFRA 'courts must take adequate account of the burdens a requested accommodation may impose on nonbeneficiaries.'” (quoting Cutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:50 pm by Danielle Wild
Candidate at Syracuse University College of Law and Intern at Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLPYesterday, the New York Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]