Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Section 105 of the Copyright Act precludes copyright protection for any work of the United States Government, but applies only to the federal government. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The dismissed federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 2:00 pm
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:05 pm
Code, § 6880 et seq.), which prohibit the Secretary of State from printing on a primary election ballot the name of a candidate for President of the United States who has not filed with the Secretary of State the candidate’s federal income tax returns for the five most recent taxable years. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Guess when third-party liability insurance started in the United States? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
Richter, No. 09-587 (California) and Premo v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently signed an order on a stipulation (pdf) in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
State Bar of California. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
They sued the United States in Federal Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 1:53 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:29 am
United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997) makes clear that a stipulation indicating concession of a material fact is rarely an adequate substitute for the evidence it seeks to exclude. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
In Sterling Park v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
The state high court also held in Pitzer College v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm
Unit Owners Ass’n v. 1815A St., Condo. [read post]
