Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 12,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
The two cases decided by the Court yesterday in Swarthout v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Guess when third-party liability insurance started in the United States? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:06 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently signed an order on a stipulation (pdf) in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The dismissed federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
They sued the United States in Federal Court. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(Ibid., citing United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:43 am
The United States District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of California granted defendants’ motions and dismissed the complaints. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:47 am
Richter, No. 09-587 (California) and Premo v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:05 pm
Code, § 6880 et seq.), which prohibit the Secretary of State from printing on a primary election ballot the name of a candidate for President of the United States who has not filed with the Secretary of State the candidate’s federal income tax returns for the five most recent taxable years. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
In Sterling Park v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
As I have noted before, New Mexico is the only United States jurisdiction that makes polygraph evidence presumptively admissible barring a prior stipulation by the parties. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
The state high court also held in Pitzer College v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
State Bar of California. [read post]
