Search for: "State of New York et al" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 12:28 pm by Conor McEvily
GriffinDocket: 10-854Issue(s): Whether application of New York's state constitutional “meaningful representation” standard to evaluate Sixth Amendment claims of ineffective assistance of counsel results in decisions that are "contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law" as required by the federal habeas statute.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Circuit)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 3:31 am by Walter Olson
State then charges defendant over same conduct. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Kelly Hyman
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. ( No. 7:16-cv-00270) from the Southern District of New York; Steve Okstad et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Kelly Hyman
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. et al. ( No. 7:16-cv-00270) from the Southern District of New York; Steve Okstad et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
" These concerns were prompted by a ruling from a California District Court on August 13, 2010 in Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 2:46 pm by Nicholas Pengelley
The front page of today’s New York Times is not solely concerned with the fallout from President Obama’s well publicized dustup with Bibi Netanyahu. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:34 am
New York: Monthly Review Press, 1990.Borgnäs, Kajsa, et al., eds. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Central New York Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. [read post]