Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 9,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:00 am
First Judicial District March 7, 2017 Cohen, J.), the court issued an Rule 1925 Opinion asserting that its decision to dismiss a motor vehicle accident Plaintiff’s underinsured motorist claim against her employer’s insurer should be affirmed by the appellate court because the Plaintiff, after consulting with a lawyer, signed a General Release releasing “any and all other persons or entities whatsoever. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
First, the district court held that no cause of action could lie in this case. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:46 am
The closely divided (5-4) ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the case of Bond v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod observes that the court’s decision earlier this term in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:54 am
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Because Congress is presumed to be aware of, and to adopt, a judicial interpretation of a statute when it reenacts that law without change, Lorillard v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
The Court’s previous statements concerning this issue appeared to potentially conflict with the reasoning and holding of the First District’s decision in Masonite Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
On the first point, it is well-settled that, "except in extraordinary circumstances, a federal court should not enjoin a pending state proceeding that is judicial in nature and involves important state interests," see JMM Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
District Court for Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
The Court of Appeals notes that "in the context of a motion to dismiss, district courts in this Circuit have therefore found that complaints sufficiently allege employment when they state where the plaintiffs worked, outline their positions, and provide their dates of employment." [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
In a published opinion filed February 24, 2023, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) reversed a judgment upholding the adequacy of the EIR for the University of California, Berkeley’s long range campus development plan (“LRDP”) and a controversial housing development project at the historic People’s Park. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Pattison v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
:On September 7, 2007, the parties returned to the District Court [D. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am
Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
