Search for: "State v. Race" Results 1041 - 1060 of 8,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 4:48 pm
"We are attacking everything about the case, which includes the state's version of the facts and the evaluation if death is the appropriate penalty. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:35 pm
Professor Timothy Glynn of Seton Hall University highlights here on the Race to the Bottom blog, a new article he has written that examines the internal affairs doctrine, and in particular the 2005 decision of the Delaware Supreme Court  called Vantage Point Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 10:00 am by Adam Schlossman
  This is the latest edition in our Race and the Court program. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 2:36 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
This blog was co-authored by: Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney In the June 2022 case of Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd and Others v Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board and Another, involving a decision of a gambling board to impose conditions in respect of gambling licences, the Supreme Court of Appeal said the following: There is no dispute that decisions of the Board amount to administrative action under the Promotion of Administrative Justice, Act 2000 (PAJA). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:42 am by bklemm@foley.com
They also argued that the landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that the EEOC relied upon, Bostock v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will examine the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions. [read post]