Search for: "USPTO"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 18,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2007, 1:59 am
While the USPTO regrets the inconvenience to GPO's customers as a result of the GPO printing error, the USPTO's electronic TMOG is the official version. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:17 am
In a press release, the USPTO announced the availability of the e-Office Action program for patent applications. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 3:10 am
" The Guide explains "how the USPTO will examine applications following the Supreme Court’s decision in Tam. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:06 am
Written comments must be received by the USPTO on or before July 11, 2016. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:22 am
(See USPTO Fee Schedule.) [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:35 pm
Washington Conference Center, and will include sessions on copyrights (by Ben Hardman, Attorney Advisor, Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement (OIPPE), USPTO), patents (by Marina Lamm, Attorney Advisor, OIPPE), trademarks, and intellectual property enforcement. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 10:46 am
Greg Aharonian's Internet Patent News Service has posted a copy of the USPTO's response to twenty questions of the Congressional Subcommittee on the Courts, Internet, and Intellectual Property following the subcommittee hearing on February 27, 2008.The answer to question 5 details the PTOs current "suggestions for effectively reducing the application backlog:"Applicant Quality Submissions Worksharing Increase Capacity (through Telework, a University Certificate in Patent… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted Tafas' and Smithkline Beecham's Motions for Summary Judgment, effectively holding that the USPTO's proposed 5/25 and 2+1 rules regarding claims and continuation practice are illegal, and therefore null and void.Read the opinion here:GSKSummJudgOPINION.pdfThe case is: Tafas v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:15 pm
The USPTO has extended its public comment period on the subject of patenting artificial intelligence inventions. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
From a USPTO press release on 2 Feb. 2011:The USPTO also announced today a new effort to eliminate the “tail” of backlog applications that were more than 16 months old at the beginning of the fiscal year and had not yet received a first Office Action, known as “Clearing the Oldest Patent Applications” (or COPA). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:30 am
The information includes:Federal Register Notice: (link is external)July 2015 Update on Subject Matter Eligibility (link is external)NEWJuly 2015 Update: Subject Matter EligibilityNEWJuly 2015 Update Appendix 1: ExamplesNEWJuly 2015 Update Appendix 2: Index of Eligibility ExamplesNEWJuly 2015 Update Appendix 3: Subject Matter Eligibility Court DecisionsNEWJuly 2015 Update: Interim Eligibility Guidance Quick Reference SheetNEWFor additional information, see… [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:02 am
As the USPTO bids farewell to this popular program, patent practitioners are focusing on reshuffling their after-final strategies. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 12:23 pm
David Kappos participates in inventor round-table at USPTO, 3/29/10. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:10 am
The USPTO has been aggressively seeking public comment prior to publishing the proposed new rule notices due to the significant amount of changes introduced by the legislation and the short time time frame. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch The USPTO's backlog of requests for continued examination (RCEs) continues to grow. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:39 pm
UPDATE: In an April 21, 2011 email to USPTO employees, Director David Kappos announced that this program would be suspended until further notice because of USPTO funding cuts in 2011. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm
” Excuse us for asking the USPTO to correctly implement its own PTA rules! [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
The forum will be held on Tuesday, January 14, 2014, at the USPTO campus in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
The roundtables in Alexandria, VA on April 15 and Denver on May 8 will be webcast live through the USPTO website. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 2:55 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld an en banc decision of the CAFC, ruling that the USPTO is not entitled to recover its attorney's fees in an appeal from an adverse USPTO decision via a civil action under Section 145 of the Patent Statute. [read post]
