Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 1041 - 1060 of 8,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm by Matthew David Brozik
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:06 am by Jed
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Timothy S. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
Last year, we took a look at the case of Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 784 F.3d 1335, 1341-45 (10th Cir. 2015)(finding no federal regulation that paralleled state common law claimsand further concluding that state law off-label promotion claim was preempted by § 360k); United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am by Barry Sookman
The Court rendered a decision in 2011, Mosley v The United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 774 (10 May 2011). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
Jan. 10, 2018), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied securities lawyer Norman T. [read post]