Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 8:31 am by jonathanturley
Support for this claim could be based on a  2019 study in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery that found that “Mass-shooting related homicides in the United States were reduced during the years of the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 to 2004”. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
The president has “plenary and exclusive power … as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” the Supreme Court noted more than 80 years ago in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times discusses the Court’s just-concluded Term and the tension between the Court and President Obama following the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
United States Tulsi Gabbard, a U.S. congresswoman from Hawaii, dropped a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, according to a court filing. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:06 pm
(It would bear some resemblance to the facts underlying Ohralik v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
Mueller, “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (Volume II) (2019)Evidence emerged during the summer and fall of 2016 election that the Russian government was attempting to interfere with the presidential election in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
” The refusal to cooperate is a matter of stated policy. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
McConnell’s argument is that those procedures were adopted by unanimous vote for the Clinton impeachment and that precedent should be followed here. [read post]