Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 1041 - 1060 of 23,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2014, 3:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
She further asserted that the non-legal  expenses sought by Petitioner were excessive because her husband did not need to  travel to the United States with her because he was not a party to these proceedings. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had… [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
In April of 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky heard a case involving a woman and her pregnancy discrimination and Retaliation claims. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent argued that under Ozaltin, which she stated is “the leading case” on this issue, an award of fees is clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she and the children remained in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
This child spent the first three years of her life living in Sweden, visiting the United States for only one or two months a year. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Beth Graham
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to consider whether asking a party to an arbitration agreement to demonstrate prejudice when claiming a waiver defense violates the requirement established 10 years ago in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Gamba then changed tactics, traveling to Mexico in July 2016 and hiring “coyotes” to smuggle her across the United States border. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Each of the respondents was detained for a period of time pending his or her removal from the United Kingdom pursuant to the Immigration Act 1971 of Schedule 2 paragraph 16(2). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
  The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
” Rufo testified that respondent is seeking asylum in the United States because she fears for her life in Mexico. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:58 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Dieter's defense to jurisdiction - that she did nothing in the United States - did not carry the day, according the Second Circuit.Read the Chicago Tribune's article for a summary of the case, and then the short Second Circuit opinion below.MacDermid v. [read post]