Search for: "United States v. Houston"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a nutshell, the question in TC Heartland v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:17 am
Attorney Alex V. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:25 am
United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), which stated that `the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their ‘persons, houses, papers, and effects,’ is not extended to the open fields. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:56 am
Her trailblazing accomplishments have been recognized on the floor of the 116th United States Congress. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:28 pm
State of Ohio v MERS and Banks// [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
The qui tam case is titled United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
-Beaumont 1917, writ ref'd) (quoting Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:08 am
Grits suspects a program maxxing out solitary confinement under the Morales v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:17 am
Gonzalez-Badillo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:02 am
There are over two dozen United States District Court Judges in the Southern District, twelve of which are located in the Houston Division. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
Supreme Court sided with the Texas courts in Medellin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
” The procedural changes to NLRB election procedures implemented by the quickie election rule place employers at a significant disadvantage when faced with a union demand for an election, Incorporating most of the procedures contained in a 2011 NLRB proposal previously invalidated by the District of Columbia’s district court in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am
ARTICLE V: COVENANT FOR ASSESSMENTS … Section 4. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
