Search for: "Unknown Doe 6" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
I say that this happened `a short while later,’ because, I am told by the parties that the exact timing of Bradbury's subsequent comments are unknown. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
A p-value provides information only about the plausibility of random error given the study result, but the true relationship between agent and outcome remains unknown. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Alternatives: as was demonstrated previously, screen capture software does in fact allow you to make use of video, so you’re not deprived of ability to take video clips and manipulate them. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
It is the same sense I get when dealing with coercive control, which PD12J now more than nods at but which it is extraordinarily difficult to get any judicial airtime for (particularly since the advent of the 6 allegations mantra which is now so problematically prevalent). [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:46 pm by Old Fox
cfem=1Liberals Are Destroying AmericaTerry BOWNERDiscussion  -  6:27 AM 5 Reasons Bush Didn't Lie About WMD - by the Daily Caller1.) [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:39 am by Tessa Shepperson
Although it is certainly not unknown for new landlords to have unrealistic ideas about their rights over sitting tenants. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
In cases of genuinely novel or unknown biological agents, or agents that spread with great rapidity, of course, these measures are far from assured to defend against the attack. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
<http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/does-njac-bill-curb-independence-of-judiciary/article6347980.ece>. [2] George H. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE:    DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY    Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:21 am
Renshaw, 258 S.E.2d 744 (1979), does not control here. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:30 am by Jani
In Canada, under the Federal Court Rules, the disclosure of such information is very similar to the Australian provision; and Voltage LLC, the parent company of Dallas Buyers Club, has successfully used the provision to gain such information in Canada in the case of Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe. [read post]