Search for: "White v. People"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 6,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 November 2021 White J handed down judgment in the case of Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:19 pm
Simon Johnson at Stour Chambers points out Lord Justice Thorpe's comment that pre-nuptials are not just for the 'super-rich':"I would not accept that the genesis for the call for legislative provision for ante-nuptial contracts was the decision of the House in White v White. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:27 am
One could argue, for example, for more regularly granting standing based on equal treatment claims that have a specific constitutional basis (e.g., pertaining to religion or race).Suppose Congress enacted a s"White People's Tax Credit," offering white people a tax credit that equaled $X outright, or say a 100% credit for food outlays up to $X. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
As the white population advanced, that of the Indians necessarily receded. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Had the filibuster failed, the White House vowed to veto the bill. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:34 am
Defendant was spotted by police with a group of people in a downtown Hyannis hotel parking lot. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
The Consultation Paper explains that this is intended to ensure that the provision catches publications to a limited number of people (e.g. a blog with a small number of subscribers). [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:29 pm
Jack Smith, the federal special counsel in the Trump Jan. 6 case (and Florida stolen classified documents case), has done his best to explain to the American people what kind of criminal occupied the White House from 2017 until early 2021. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
In Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
To Justice Thomas, the intentions of people who in good faith wanted more racial diversity on campuses in 2013 are no different from the intentions of people who wanted all-white campuses in 1954. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:52 am
’ CPL []100.40(1); People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:18 am
That was found to be the case in Erps v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
Some people focus on the silver lining.Justice Stevens' opinion (sorry, Bennett, I prefer the visual aesthetic of omitting that final "s") in Padilla v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:22 pm
It was my chance to help out our own people. . . [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
McHugh is a "friend of white supremacists" is true, but nothing in her questions to me gave me any reason to believe she is a racist. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:46 am
Superior Court in McGee v. [read post]
