Search for: "*money v. Thomas" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
Reimbursing NYSHIP Medicare-eligible retirees for Medicare Part B premiums Munger v Board of Educ. of the Garrison Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 05034, Appellate Division, Second Department Carol Munger and other retirees of the Garrison Union Free School District sued in an effort to recover damages for breach of contract and for a judgment declaring that they are entitled to reimbursement for money they expended for Medicare Part B premiums since reaching the age of… [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved- IPSO mediation 01201-20 Gallagher v Lincs Free Press, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01139-20 Wood v Grimsby Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach- after investigation 09696-19 Hudson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 07463-19 Ward v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication Last… [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Thomas, No. 07-1237 Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a drug and weapons prosecution is affirmed where the defendant was searched pursuant to a lawful arrest for resisting arrest. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:18 am by Lyle Denniston
Article III, though, was little more than a footnote in the argument in the case of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Every time judges solicit funds for any cause there is always the risk that those that appear before the court may suspect that the judge may be affected by the resulting financial support.[96] A “system of justice based on how much money you gave or raised for the judge before whom you are appearing cannot sustain public trust, and inevitably the public will believe about the judiciary what they believe about politics: money is what determines results”.[97] If… [read post]