Search for: "American Express Co. v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
This was a rather contradictory stand taken by him, as he was also a co-sponsor to the United States Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 which encouraged generic drugs. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
The Milward decision embraced a vacuous methodology sometimes called “weight of the evidence” (WOE) or “inference to the best explanation,” which had been previously rejected by other Circuits, as well as by the United States Supreme Court, in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am
Paul Bland of Public Justice, writing at the Consumer Law and Policy Blog, describes American Express Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
United States, 220 F. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm
The argument about unit cohesion is also one that had long been made against allowing gays—and African Americans before them—to serve in the military. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
The Southern states were still occupied by Northern soldiers; and due to this occupation, African Americans exercised their voting rights for the first time. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 am
In 1952, the United States was involved in the Korean War. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
In 1964 the US Supreme Court as New York Times Co v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 recognised that the First Amendment applied to state laws on defamation. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Brown Express, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:26 pm
In a sharply worded reply memorandum filed Tuesday in the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
