Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 30,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Estee Lauder Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:05 am
In Kariye v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
In Smithback v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
Affairs v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
So if they do lower the burden the changes will be applied retroactively and affect (and infect) issued patents and pending patent applications. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:56 pm
LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:06 pm
Burwell 15-105 Issue: (1) Whether the availability of a regulatory method for nonprofit religious employers to comply with HHS’s contraceptive mandate eliminates either the substantial burden on religious exercise or the violation of RFRA that this Court recognized in Burwell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
Cole 15-274 Issue: (1) Whether, when applying the “undue burden” standard of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:42 am
The case of the NJDCPP v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
(bill was included as Title V of omnibus Job Creation and Reducing Small Business Burdens Act, H.R. 5405, which passed House by vote of 320-102 on September 16, 2014).Disclosure Modernization and Simplification Act, H.R. 4569: Passed House by voice vote on December 2, 2014. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Wiggins v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
We watched with great interest as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reviewed the case of Cruz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 6:19 am
The Court makes it easier for employers to prove that the plaintiff is exempt from overtime.The case is EMD Sales v. [read post]
