Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US " Results 1061 - 1080 of 7,782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:41 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This information is used to create a smart contract –a slight misnomer for the conditional computer program that controls the bare bones of the subsequent transactions (“if X occurs, effect Y”). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The US, the European Patent Office, and Australia all have considered this question. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
" The Board applied a three-element test to determine "whether, to whom and under what circumstances a protective order may be amended to allow release of AEO to in-house counsel: (1) consideration of a party’s need for the confidential information in order to adequately prepare its case, (2) the harm that disclosure would cause the party submitting the confidential information, and (3) the forum’s interest in maintaining the… [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya has more information here. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
And the Biden administration is in possession of the information. [read post]
When licensing your business’ data, consider addressing the following: where can the data be used; who owns the data; what can the data (not) be used for; who else can use the data; can the data be modified; whether there are any confidentiality and data security obligations; representations or warranties made in respect of the data (e.g. the data is free from viruses, reasonable efforts were made to ensure accuracy of data, etc.); how and in what form will… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
App makers will now have to offer users options over how their information is used, which includes opting out of targeted advertising. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:20 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Information obtained as part of an employer’s medical inquiry may not be used for any purpose inconsistent with a legitimate medical inquiry. 29 C.F.R. [read post]
Assemblymember David Chiu introduced AB 1184 to ensure that “patient information is kept confidential if they are not the primary policyholder for their health insurance” and seek sensitive health care services like those “related to mental or behavioral health, sexual and reproductive health, sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorder, gender affirming care, and intimate partner violence. [read post]
There are cases holding that an employee must possess confidential information or even trade secrets for a non-compete to stick and cases essentially finding that non-competes are as presumptively valid as any other contract. [read post]
There are cases holding that an employee must possess confidential information or even trade secrets for a non-compete to stick and cases essentially finding that non-competes are as presumptively valid as any other contract. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:08 am by Chad Main
  Ultimately Selectica sued Novatus and the employee for misuse of confidential information and unlawful competition. [read post]