Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”):  The FTC announced that it has issued orders to eight companies that offer surveillance pricing products and services that incorporate data about consumers’ characteristics and behavior. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In that case, lawyers from outside California arranged to begin arbitration, negotiate settlement on behalf of their client, and periodically travel to California to advise a California client on a dispute with another California-based company. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Among the significant unresolved issues is given that the SEC has by this Final Rule taken the position that the federal agency has broad authority to mandate climate disclosures, does this preempt California’s recently passed disclosure law (that is being challenged in court by businesses) which applies to an untold number of companies across the country and the globe that do business in California, already serving as a national standard? [read post]
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am by Mandelman
The indictment alleges that Stein has been engaged in a scheme to pump up the stock price of Signalife Inc. by lying about the company’s sales activity. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am by SHG
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP finance) In the midst of a financial meltdown, smart companies will increase strategic IP management efforts (IP finance) Intellectual Property Colloquium - IP podcast site (The Trademark Blog) Open Access Day - 14 October (Spicy IP) Quick question - 'non-asserts' as licence? [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am by Marie Louise
PartsRiver, Kelora (WHDA) District Court N D California: Attorney negligence, revival, and inequitable conduct: Aristocrat Technologies, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
But the gap between the price of legal services as provided by lawyers, and the price of commercially-provided legal services is too large now to make that professional relationship a sufficiently competitive marketing factor. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has stated that the government has issued a notice to Whatsapp in a bid to hold social media companies accountable for misuse of the platforms. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]