Search for: "Deter v. Deter" Results 1061 - 1080 of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am by Stewart Baker
But the Illinois state courts, unburdened by federal standing law, may yet give teeth to this seriously dumb law as Rosenbach v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 9:48 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: Court of Appeals of Colorado, Division ThreeOpinion Date: 11/8/12Cite: Health Grades, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm by Stewart Baker
But the Illinois state courts, unburdened by federal standing law, may yet give teeth to this seriously dumb law as Rosenbach v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
Fraudulent Inducement Claims Rejected by CourtIn Shareholder Buyout Dispute The broad release language contained in a buyout agreement is enforced, despite claims of fraudulent inducement, affirms the Appellate Division of Superior Court in Marino v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So this is really a sanctions case and not a defamation case.The case is Goldman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:18 am by Karen Gullo
The $399-million damage award against Samsung, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Apple v. [read post]