Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm
The gift tax is at 35%, with a $1 Million lifetime exemption. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:56 pm
Cir. 2007), does not apply to method claims, since methods are processes and are therefore among the expressly permitted categories of statutory subject matter. [read post]
24 May 2016, 10:37 am
Cir. 2007), does not apply to method claims, since methods are processes and are therefore among the expressly permitted categories of statutory subject matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Just because you drive away, that does not mean that you leave your troubles or the trouble you caused for others in the accident behind you. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 3:42 am
Ritchie, 35 F.3d 1477, 1481 (10th Cir. 1994) (same); Freeman, 325 F. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm
The Applicant filed a Reply Brief, arguing as follows: The Examiner's Answer asserts that because the applicants' specification does not expressly disclose a computer product on a computer readable medium, claim 10 does not satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. ... [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 9:26 am
35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
The Supreme Court has defined “judicial exceptions”[6] to subject matter otherwise deemed eligible for patenting under 35 USC 101. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:16 pm
Appellant’s Br. 32–35. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
The Polish court wondered whether Artt. 34, 35 and 36 TFEU would prevent Hewlett Packard from enforcing its trade mark rights given the circumstances of the case. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
§41(c)(1), and implemented by 37 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
If a timely formal "Answer to Complaint" is not filed within 35 days, a default can be entered against the defendant. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Here, the surrender was not made to avoid prior art but because of a restriction requirement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:10 pm
CEQA does not apply to the consultation process. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 1:38 pm
Doe would agree. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 1:37 pm
Fromson, 755 F.2d at1555.Instead, the “deference [owed] to the decisions of theUSPTO takes the form of the presumption of validityunder 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:13 am
In addition to speed, reexamination may be more attractive as it does not subject all claims to review like reissue, and does not consider patentability issues such as statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:21 pm
"The majority of articles, around 80% in total, are sent to law reviews in the six weeks following February 1 and the six weeks following August 1. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:05 am
The release also may indicate that the CFPB does not intend to delay the effective date of the rule beyond August 1. [read post]
