Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The second case concerned exactly that scenario: in Gordon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am by gstasiewicz
According to the Arizona Daily Star, in response to a threat by Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon to challenge the new illegal immigration law, “Phoenix City Attorney Gary Verburg said only the City Council has the power to authorize lawsuits. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by emagraken
The defendants’ proposition that a low velocity accident cannot cause any significant injury to a plaintiff has not been accepted in a number of cases, including Gordon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
         MARIA JAYNE WYATT v GORDON A CARTWRIGHT  10/11/2010 8. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by admin
And money has only become more prominent in the American political system following the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To give rise to constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent, and exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the happening of an accident to permit the defendant to discover and remedy it (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836; see also Chianese v Meier, 98 NY2d 270, 278). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:15 am
In February -- one month after the patent case in question, Berger v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
   Even major car manufacturer, Honda, couldn’t displace that image, when in the mid-90s, it introduced a print ad to promote its Accord V-6 Coupe, with the tag line, “the automotive equivalent of a really hot librarian. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]