Search for: "Graham v. US" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the split among lower courts regarding the proper interpretation of Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by John Pfaff
Adam Liptak has a depressing piece up in today's New York Times about how states are respodning to the Supreme Court's decision in Graham v Florida, which declared life without parole sentences for minors unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by INFORRM
” It goes on to explain that in the course of the ordinary use of the internet: “[the user's] object is to view the material. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
I didn't write about how the so-called "public-safety" exception made up by the Supremes in New York v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am by Rumpole
 Lightsey was 16 years old at the time and the sentence of life without parole was clearly in violation of the US Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
” The US Supreme Court in Golan v Holder has recognised that “some restriction on expression is the inherent and intended effect of every grant of copyright. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Here's a note on a topic that has not been greatly appreciated in IP circles: the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Victoria Police Chief Jamie Graham will present a motion to the B.C. government in June to seize the phones of distracted drivers and increase fines. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:47 pm by Graham Donath
It should serve to be an extremely useful tool to help combat the excessive use of PC 186.22(a) against our clients. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:49 am by Dennis Crouch
However, that ultimate conclusion is based upon a set of factual underpinnings as explained by Graham v. [read post]