Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 16,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm
’” The Court also adopted the reasoning in Gavriiloglou v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am
While the Centre’s rate determination is not binding on a court, and there is no stated procedure for introducing the FRAND determination in a judicial proceeding, one would hope that the Centre’s determination will be used as evidence in most European judicial proceedings concerning the affected SEPs. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In the end, like a driver making a surreptitious U-turn and hoping no one was watching, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has backpedaled on the issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
The best that you could possibly hope for anyway is to somehow prevail in state court (which ain't gonna happen) and then have that decision summarily reversed by the Supreme Court in a blistering opinion.But as it is, as expected, you lose -- consistently -- long before that, including but not limited to in today's published opinion by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
It is beyond reasonable hope that anyone coming to it fresh can readily assimilate all its ins and outs. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574, 604 n.30 (1983); McGowan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:21 am
Neapco case, which many were hoping to clear up Section 101. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Although the dissenting opinion cites Bond v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Holt v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:54 am
Burwell and King v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:13 am
Eisen (@NormEisen), Siven Watt (@SivenWatt), Joshua Kolb and Joshua Stanton (@StantonLaw) In Trump Case, Procedures Exist to Safeguard the Former President’s Right to an Impartial Jury by Debra Perlin (@DebraPerlin) Congress v State Department Congress Can Investigate the Afghanistan Withdrawal Without Compromising a Vital Dissent Channel by Ambassador Daniel Fried (@AmbDanFried) Foreign Investment in Social Media/Technology How Lawmakers Hope to Sidestep… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
Arcamona: Rule that became Art. 17 was supposed to be 2018; we started implementation then and hoped to interact w/member states about implementation. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
(See Edwards v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
