Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In an old California case from 1970, Keeler v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:43 am
This comes on the heels of Ohio’s continued unwillingness to follow the decision in Hughes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Richard Caputo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania addressed allegations of negligence per se in the case of Hughes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Hughes v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Supp.2d 439, 445 (D.N.J. 2003); Hughes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
ComptonCitizenship, Gender, and Conscience: United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Judge Norris dissented (Keller v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 11:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
