Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 1061 - 1080 of 182,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 2:10 pm by Glenn Reynolds
But don’t worry, there’s a role for lawyers, too: “Most interesting is the fact that this new cut of meat apparently counts as intellectual property, replete with its own licensing and a patent on the cut’s fabrication.” I hope the legal fees were, er, juicy. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:36 pm by Danielle Turturo
After reading Laura’s article and the many articles already out about the Marc Jacob’s intern tweeting gone bad, I began to wonder if this is the first time something like this has happened? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Platkin’s decision, granting in part and denying in part the defendants’ pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint, addressed interesting issues concerning the effect of the defendant members’ withdrawal from the PLLC on their undertakings in FSL’s operating agreement to buy out the plaintiff’s membership interest. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision also contains an interesting statement on the value of computer simulations:[4.3] It is also undisputed between the parties that the condenser of granted claim 1 differs explicitly from [the] prior art only in the additional presence of the SICC duct. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:57 pm by Douglas A. Berman
The full headline of the piece serves as a summary: "For These Veterans, Growing Pot Isn't Just A Job, It's A Cause: For veterans learning to cultivate marijuana through a Los Angeles grower's internship... [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm by Steve Lash
Who wouldn’t want a job that pays $176,433 a year and gives you job security until age 70? [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:26 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion to compel the production of communications between plaintiff and the prior owner of the patents-in-suit that plaintiffs withheld as privileged and rejected defendant's interpretation of the common interest doctrine. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
”The AD1 was also of the view C.T. wasn’t entitled to a “hearing,” because he lacked a “property interest” in the renewal of his licenses. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:11 am by Donn Zaretsky
" In addition, the current rules "don’t prohibit a museum from selling ...; they merely limit the use of proceeds from the artwork that’s sold. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
This (Kinkeldey) decision is very interesting on more than one account.First, the decision deals with a provision of the Paris Convention (PC) that is hardly known at all : the possibility of claiming an exhibition priority (Article 11 PC). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:03 am by Ezra Rosser
Journal, Feb. 16, 2018 [for those who followed the debates about Wax’s original op-ed, here is a follow-up op-ed by Wax that may or may not interest you]. [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
T-Mobile’s largest shareholder, German telecommunications company, Deutsche Telekom AG, controls 62 percent of the company. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am by Colin Miller
Everybody wanted part of the money, but they couldn’t handle the job. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm by Georgialee Lang
The judge commented: “I can tell you I’m not going to sign this order because I don’t think in the circumstances of this case at this moment it serves the best interests of the children. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:31 am
In 1993, the New York Court of Appeals held that, for a finding of bad faith, “the plaintiff must establish that the insurer’s conduct constituted a ‘gross disregard’ of the insured’s interests – that is, a deliberate or reckless failure to place on equal footing the interests of its insured with its own interests when considering a settlement offer. [read post]