Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 1061 - 1080 of 12,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 1:07 pm by Andy Taylor
 We’re getting these out quickly, so please let us know if you read the opinions and have a different understanding. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 11:17 am by SCOTUStalk
Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:05 am by First Mondays
Even more exciting, we review the first opinions of the still young term. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am by Davidson Stephanie
For example, if you’re reading an opinion that has a reference to Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:06 pm
If it seems that way to you, you're not alone. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm by David Ettinger
  The summary includes those civil cases in which (1) review has been granted (not including grant-and-transfers), (2) review has been denied but one or more justices has voted for review, or (3) the Court has ordered depublished an opinion of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am by The Charge
 The dissenting opinion of Miller v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:44 pm
Very cool stuff.Speaking of Justice Ginsburg and dissenting opinions, we're relying on one right now: McMillian v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:38 am by First Mondays
And we interview superstar Supreme Court advocate Kannon Shanmugam of Williams & Connolly, who talks about what it was like being on the winning end of Justice Neil Gorsuch’s first majority opinion in Henson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:56 am
"Said Justice Kagan, quoted in "Kagan calls leak of draft opinion overturning Roe 'horrible' and expects investigation update by month's end" (CNN).It's traditional to critique judges for deciding cases according to their political preferences instead of strictly saying what the law is.And it's traditional to emphasize the way it looks to people and the attendant threat to the Court's power: If we don't look as though… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:47 pm
If you answered "yes," just remember: you're not paranoid if they're really out to get you. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Justice Dougherty also filed a concurring opinion, setting out procedures which he believes would provide adequate due process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
Same as any other "medical malpractice" case.Justice Bromberg disagrees, and his dissent is fairly persuasive to me. 'Cause I was having the same sort of thoughts that he articulated when I was reading the majority opinion myself.Full disclosure, though: Twenty or so years ago, I did a little work alongside then-not-a-Justice Bromberg. [read post]