Search for: "In Re Queen"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 1:56 pm
John's University School of Law, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Queens, NY 11439 [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
Important though the first may be, at the very root and heart of the relationship between the disputants – they’re often called the Parties – we deal here with the arbitration agreement. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:31 pm
To re-cap, when a person dies the house in which he/she lived may continue to be occupied by someone who is not entitled to receive the entire property either pursuant to a Last Will or through intestate administration. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
In a recent decision, In re: Queen's University at Kingston, the Federal Circuit recognized that communications between U.S. patent applicants and non-attorney patent agents should receive some degree of privilege. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:23 am
Sorry, kids, but you’re fucking this all up, and somebody has to tell you because you aren’t getting this on your own. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
That the reforms taken by the CCP under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping produced socialist modernization with its emphasis on Socialist markets and economic activity does not make it any less ideological—unless one embraces the conceit that ideology must be as flamboyant as a drag queen on stage to merit serious attention. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:29 am
The grant of a mandamus petition in the case --IN RE: QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON,PARTEQ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INNOVATIONS -- includes the textWe find, consistent with Rule 501 of the Federal Rulesof Evidence, that a patent-agent privilege is justified “inthe light of reason and experience. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Queens University (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
On 25 February 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Re W (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 113. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 3:49 pm
They should still be honeymooning, but instead they’re already know each other so well they’re barely sick of each other. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 pm
p=757Fri. 26 Feb. 2016:Voices conference - Voices of Individuals - Collectively Exploring Self-Determination, Dublin (Sold Out)http://ercvoices.com/events/Wed. 2 March 2016:Constitutions, referendums and the family - Dublinhttps://www.ria.ie/events/constitutional-conversations-no-1-6Thu. 3 March 2016:Irish Refugee Council: Single Protection Procedure Seminar, Dublinhttp://www.pila.ie/bulletin/2016/february-2016/10-feb/3-4 March 2016:Symposium on the Legal Regulation & Policing of Commercial Sex,… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 pm
p=757Fri. 26 Feb. 2016:Voices conference - Voices of Individuals - Collectively Exploring Self-Determination, Dublin (Sold Out)http://ercvoices.com/events/Wed. 2 March 2016:Constitutions, referendums and the family - Dublinhttps://www.ria.ie/events/constitutional-conversations-no-1-6Thu. 3 March 2016:Irish Refugee Council: Single Protection Procedure Seminar, Dublinhttp://www.pila.ie/bulletin/2016/february-2016/10-feb/3-4 March 2016:Symposium on the Legal Regulation & Policing of Commercial Sex,… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 11:21 am
We’re calling on the President to stand with human rights organizations, tech companies, and over 100,000 concerned technology user and defend encryption. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:14 pm
We're suckers; once you got em, you just can't give em up. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Spicer, 2016 SCC 3 (36532) Judgment rendered Jan. 18, 2016 Publication ban, re defence of mistaken belief. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Word to the wise, don’t try to navigate this fair use question on your own, even if you’re just planning to use the words, knowing you can’t use the logo. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts (123 Misc 346 [Sur Ct, Columbia County 1924], affd 213 App Div 59 [4th Dept 1925], affd 241 NY 593 [1925]), and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman (34 NY2d 1 [1974]) (see Matter of Berkman, 93 Misc 2d 423 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 1978]). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Our rights don’t come from any king or queen or black-robed judge—they come from God Almighty. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 10:25 am
"She paused, then blinked and her face began to move toward him on the end of her neck.There was that Queen Cersei smile. [read post]
