Search for: "In Re Stanley" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Stanley Brotman, on a theory of general negligence for failing to warn. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
The People) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) 2nd Circuit: Copyright class action settlement fails – Unregistered copyrights not adequately represented: In re Literary Works in Electronic Databases Copyright Litigation (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Oracle defends copyrightability of APIs – implications go way beyond Android and Java (FOSS Patents) RIAA – RIAA targets YouTube over leaked Britney Spears… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:19 am by Juan Antúnez
Here’s how the 1st DCA explained this point, relying heavily on a similar 1986 case out of Arizona: [I]n In re Strobel, 149 Ariz. 213, 717 P.2d 892, 893–94 (1986), Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by JB
“We're at the point where there would have to be some, you know, some serious disruptions in order not to raise [the debt ceiling],” he said. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:26 pm by Rory Little
” But Roberts re-entered the discussion and read the “question presented” in Eisenhammer’s brief back to him: “I was confused. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Re, Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court, 136 Harv. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bateman v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1601 McCallum J struck out a number of contextual imputations in the defence but gave leave to re-plead two of them. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
At a conference call with their lawyers on September 17, 2014, Kay stated his willingness to discuss potential “amendments” to the August 28 agreements but was unwilling to rescind and re-execute them. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am by Jack Sharman
  We may be faced with an evolving re-definition of that law school chestnut: Who is the client? [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
"[24]     Additionally, a defendant does not need to purchase or sell actual securities to be found liable, which is also a much broader provision than under the federal securities laws.[25] Further, the Martin Act does not require "proof of intent to defraud, reliance, or damages" to establish misdemeanor liability; felony liability does require proof of intent but not customer reliance.[26] Unlike the SEC, which only possesses civil litigation… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:06 pm
Sure, lots of jobs are tied to the auto industry, but the bankruptcy of one or more of the Big Three would not shut down the economy the way the collapse of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, following the Lehman failure, would have done. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]