Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
Vincent Corner, Head of Hong Kong Office & Head of Sectors - Asia, Pinsent Masons Dr Gao Xiqing, formerly Deputy Chairman, China Securities Regulatory Commission; Chief Executive Officer, China Investment Corporation Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
Alberta Securities Commission, 1989 CanLII 121 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 301; Ringrose v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
After taking time off for its first judicial conference since COVID and to celebrate Independence Day, the D. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm
First, the Court addressed the standard by which courts in the Third Circuit determine a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:52 am
The form shall also include a notice that if the person stopped believes they have been stopped, detained or searched solely because of their race, color, ethnicity, age, gender or sexual orientation, they may file a complaint with the appropriate law enforcement agency, and instructions on how to file such complaint; The CT Mirror reports on the basics of this bill: The anti-profiling bill sets standards for reporting the information and shifts responsibility for its analysis from the… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:25 am
(Even in baseball it isn't done the way Google apparently would like it to work in the FRAND context because of rules protecting players who are forced to renew, just like an implementer of a FRAND standard is forced to take a license to truly essential patents.)Judge Crabb has meanwhile taken her time to arrive at a well-considered decision on prejudice. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:25 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission rule may still be found liable for employing “any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud” or engaging in any practice that operates “as a fraud or deceit. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The neo-Brandeisian agenda represented in the report also drew precedential support from the competition rules that have evolved in the European Union. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm
Read more on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision below. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm
Read more on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision below. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:12 am
Why should the standard of evidentiary proof for invalidity of a patent be different at the administrative level (PTO) than at the judicial level? [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:07 pm
But I can most confidently predict judicial branch sentencing action in 2023 because the US Sentencing Commission, which is located in that branch, is finally now fully loaded and is hard at work on potential guidelines reforms. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
” This is not a difficult standard for an agency to meet, so Chevron marked a major victory for the administrative state. [read post]
24 May 2009, 4:24 am
At an open meeting on May 20, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved, by a vote of three to two, proposed rules to federalize shareholder access to company proxy materials. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
In fact, no Supreme Court Justice in modern times has consistently deferred to state and federal laws under a clear error standard. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
This rule specifies that broadcasters should apply ‘generally accepted standards’ to ‘provide adequate protection’ from harmful and/or offensive material. [read post]
contempt finding saves FTC's $120 million victory against real estate scammer even after AMG Capital
11 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:28 pm
The judicial branch is just fine with making laws abridging those freedoms. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
But challenges remain, with tightening judicial standards for showing collusion and other impediments that make it more difficult to bring, litigate, and win cases. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
Submissions of Privacy International and the Interested Parties Lord Justice Sales recorded the submissions of Privacy International, which, in summary, were that: RIPA 2000, s 67(8) is not drafted in sufficiently clear language to exclude a right to apply to the High Court for judicial review, particularly as s 67(8) ought to read in a narrow and restricted way in line with established principle; the restrictive approach to interpretation of ouster clauses which is illustrated by… [read post]
