Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was asked to determine whether the termination provisions contained within an employment agreement were enforceable. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice was asked to determine whether the termination provisions contained within an employment agreement were enforceable. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:06 am by Susan Brenner
After the supervisor spoke to his superior . . . [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am by Peter Mahler
The court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the dissolution claim is non-arbitrable because under the dissolution statute “only the superior court may grant such relief,” adding that nothing in the statute suggests the power to dissolve lies exclusively with the courts “or that parties may not agree to submit partnership dissolution and accounting disputes to arbitration. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
” State law, Wilson declared, must “yield to the treaty as the superior authority. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:09 pm
Pidwerbecki which was a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:11 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the U.S. government exploited a kind of loophole to avoid being held liable for copyright infringement and for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the DMCA).The case is Blueport Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]