Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 39,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Scott Cummings (UCLA Law) and Madeline Janis (Jobs to Move America) discuss "a little-known federal rule requiring that all contracts using federal grant funds be awarded through a 'competitive bidding' process. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:18 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Last fall, Lexis+ AI was pro v ided to faculty and select students at leading law schools to test its applications in the law school environment . [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
If you need a little FLSA 101 for your business, check out this WHD resource. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:00 pm
Similarly, while there are well-documented procedures for appropriately administering vaccines, healthcare providers make mistakes; and, here too, there is often little that vaccine recipients can do to protect themselves. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:26 pm
So she makes a claim under her own auto policy for an accident with an underinsured motorist.The insurance company (CSAA) is willing to pay, but the only medical expenses that plaintiff submits are bills for a little over $30,000, and as to those, Medi-Cal paid them, at a discount, so legally, plaintiff can only recover the (discounted) amounts Medi-Cal actually paid. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:36 am
Jape, Enigma v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:01 pm
The efficiency gap was presented to the courts in Gill v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:53 pm
The high court seemed to have little consensus over the case. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
In other words, the Act appears, at this juncture, to be both underinclusive and overinclusive, irrespective of the government interest at stake The court is taking potshots at the legislative drafting choices, which might seem a little like Monday-morning quarterbacking. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A prior case seeking to prevent the termination of the “Stay in Mexico” policy resulted in a win for the Biden administration in Biden v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Instagram, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Scis., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
