Search for: "Lowe v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 9:05 am by John P. Ahlers
United States involved the construction of a marina in a state park near a small town in North Dakota. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:28 pm by Deirdre Schifeling
Paid for by American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. in coordination with Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am by Leland E. Beck
In yesterday’s episode of the Medicare hospital disproportionate share (DSH) payment saga, the United States District Court for the for the District of Columbia vacated a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “policy” adopted in a 2004 final rule preamble that was not adopted as a rule until 2007. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm by Ryan Emenaker
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The cases below were referred to in the Court’s judgment: – Halford v the United Kingdom (25 June 1997), which concerned an office landline designated for personal use. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Manufacturers and wholesalers “tied” retailers to them by providing them with low-interest loans, reduced rents, and free equipment, employing their staff, and other means. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:43 am by SHG
  But the Second Circuit got a heaping pile of weird in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
As seen in our previous posts, the physician wants to continue his vacation and the nurse on the unit wants him to sign his verbal orders per hospital policy, the radiology director wants to decrease patient complaints and the technician wants to be heard so he can be part of the solution, the physician wants to sell his practice for a high price and the hospital wants to purchase it for a low price, the ED manager wants housekeeping to help with the cleaning and housekeeping wants… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
  Especially when, as here, they're time-sensitive matters in which delay constitutes a substantial downside itself.It's even worse in this particular case, because the Ninth Circuit ends up doing exactly what the United States asked it to do over three years ago when it filed a motion to remand the case to the BIA. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am by Ronald Mann
Unlike the narrow and low-stakes issue discussed the first hour of the day (in Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by Ben Rubin
City of San Jose, the California Supreme Court held that an inclusionary housing ordinance that required, among other things, all new residential development projects of 20 or more units to sell at least 15 percent of the for-sale units at a price that is affordable to low or moderate income households did not impose an exaction “upon the developers’ property so as to bring into play the unconstitutional conditions doctrine under the takings clause of the… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Brandi Lupo
New York City may soon become the first city in the United States to provide free legal counsel to low-income tenants facing eviction. [read post]