Search for: "MARCH v. PETER" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 3:39 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Osborne, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 547 (24 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hewett v First Plus Financial Group Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 312 (24 March 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Sabine v Ferrari [2010] EWHC 389 (QB) (11 March 2010) Ternent v Ashford & St Peter’s Hospital NHS Trust [2010] EWHC 593 (QB) (24 March 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Chasewood… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court: My sense is that Ariad v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:42 am by Robert Ambrogi
Menno and Boston Globe metro editor Jennifer Peter. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued March 16, 2010[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
The Court had first heard arguments in the case in March, 2009, and the questions raised then were mostly narrow ones—whether McCain-Feingold pertained to video-on-demand technology, for example. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:13 am by Natasha Phillips
This week, John Bolch and I discuss the brave decision by the Supreme Court in Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje; we look at Lord Laming's proposals and the possible implications after Baby Peter and why Sir Nicholas Wall may have fallen out favour with the current President of the Family Division, Sir Mark Potter.And John gets his own back on me for making him read last week's love story :)Family LoreCast for the week ending 12th March, 2010Downloadable Version [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Heyman, Professor of Law, Chicago-Kent College of Law - Kenneth Lasson, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law - Peter Molnar, Senior Research Fellow, Center for Media and Communications Studies, Central European University - Joel R. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O)   US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas)   US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O)   US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas)   US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Oman, Natural Law and the Rhetoric of Empire: Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
(Enterprise Rent-A-Car) rented a car to Jennifer Warner on March 10,2006. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
School Dist. v Endicott Teachers' Assn., 59 AD3d 799Joanne Peters, a teacher employed by the Union-Endicott Central School District was a member of the collective bargaining unit represented by the Endicott Teachers Association.In late 2006, the school district initiated an investigation of allegations that Peters was stealing school property. [read post]