Search for: "Matter of Price v Evers" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Ralph Oman, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Washington, D.C., as amicus. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Pappas or Kalogiannis ever held shares in either corporation.Three years into the legal proceedings, Fotinos moved for summary judgment on the issue of his alleged 100% stock ownership. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
A number of the borrowers fell behind or defaulted after prices for milk and other products fell. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am by Mandelman
  At best they present problems of fraud on the court, clouded title to properties coming out of foreclosure, and delay in foreclosures that will increase the shadow housing inventory and drive down home prices. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The court evaluates the interrelated concepts of fair process and fair price to determine entire fairness. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 3:52 pm
  The renewable energy approvals regime would be set out in a proposed Part V.0.1 to the EPA. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am by Kristian Soltes
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: UK Retailers Attack Visa and Mastercard Over Card FeesFinextra – October 20, 2020 The latest payments survey from the British Retail Consortium (BRC) shows card use continuing to rise steadily from 54% of transactions in 2016 to 61% in 2019. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Armed with an ever-evolving standard of care, corporate shareholders may be able to hold corporations and their management responsible for flawed or inadequate cybersecurity decision-making, which would inevitably lead to heightened exposure risks for D&O insurers in this volatile area. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Armed with an ever-evolving standard of care, corporate shareholders may be able to hold corporations and their management responsible for flawed or inadequate cybersecurity decision-making, which would inevitably lead to heightened exposure risks for D&O insurers in this volatile area. [read post]