Search for: "Matters v. City of Ames" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Wortman states in his February 17, 2012 affidavit that "I am entitled to the quantum meruit  value of my services In the Cheng v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc, v, Ralph Rjeder (86 A.D.3d 406,410 [1st Dept,  2011])   The existence of a valid and enforceable written contract governing the disputed subject matter precludes plaintiffs from recovering in quantum meruit (Shelffer v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by admin
Everyone feels heard and occasionally the council learns something that matters. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm by NL
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Universal City Studios, Inc. 464 U.S. 417 (1984) 10 Eon-Net LP v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Legal Beagle
This will be the fifth complaint to be referred to the independent panel of advisers I introduced in 2008 to rule on these matters. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
Lawcast 207: Adam Shutkever and Jeremy Hopkins of Riverview Chambers on new legal services delivery Today I am talking to Adam Shutkever, COO of LawVest, which launched Riverview Law in February  – Riverview Law is the trading name of LawVest Limited – and  Jeremy Hopkins, late of 3 Verulam Buildings where he was a clerk. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
As a matter of statutory construction, if not constitutional doctrine, SCOTUS has agreed in Columbus v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
As a matter of statutory construction, if not constitutional doctrine, SCOTUS has agreed in Columbus v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As an initial matter, we should not have pushed people into home ownership. [read post]