Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate  incidents. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The National Law Review has posted on California’s recent amendment to defamation privilege laws, extending the doctrine to cover communications related to sexual harassment claims and investigations. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm by azatty
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland, California, which is home to Bankruptcy Judges Efremsky, Hammond, and Lafferty. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 8:01 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
We also keep up-to-date loaning copies of select other states' secondary materials, like Folk on the Delaware General Corporation Law, New Jersey Transaction Guide, New York Jurisprudence, and Summary of California Law. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]