Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2013, 7:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Map of South Dakota highlighting Union County (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the District of South Dakota Judge Karen Schreier will hear arguments from Beef Products, Inc (BPI) seeking to remand its $1.2 billion defamation suit against ABC News to state court, Reuters wire service reported.The case, Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For post-September 30, 2014 plan years, the Code provides for further adjustments in the fee based on increases in the projected per capita amount of National Health Expenditures. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:44 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal. 2d 57, made it easier for injured parties to recover for products that cause injury to them. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm
Now, the defendant is appealing to our nation’s highest court, contending that “scores” of courts, both state and federal, had turned down the 1st Circuit’s claim that generic drug makers can be liable under the laws of a state for refusing to cease the sale of products that have federal government approval. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:40 pm by Leland E. Beck
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
In addition, Havner requires that a plaintiff show ‘that he or she is similar to [the subjects] in the studies’ and that ‘other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated [are excluded] with reasonable certainty’.40” 347 S.W.3d at 265 (quoting from Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the… [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States 9th Circuit to Consider Arizona’s 20 Week Abortion Ban, Seattle Times (11/5/12) [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 3:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States 9th Circuit to Consider Arizona’s 20 Week Abortion Ban, Seattle Times (11/5/12) [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]