Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
Foreign nationals not entering from the US will not be allowed to enter Canada, although there are exemptions as long as a person does not have symptoms. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Thus, the DOJ has argued in dozens of RLUIPA cases that houses of worship are supposed to be treated like “places of public assembly,” which are precisely the uses public health officials now are most concerned about. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:27 pm
This is a stark departure from the approach used in previous decisions, such as in Moreau-Bérubé v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:58 am
See Armas v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 7:03 am
See State v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
Please use this version. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm
It thereby fails to hold the Media Act to a Convention-compatible standard and allows for the Act to continue to be used to suppress free speech. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
” In other words, Frampton writes, Rule 48 “was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
More precisely, the vast majority of landmark CISG cases have come from the judicial realm, including the well-known and controversial cases such as the New Zealand mussels case, Zapata Hermanos v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:47 pm
Which is an awfully high standard. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:55 am
" Rice v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Proposed legislation could be crafted in a very precise way to stick to the requirements of Dole. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
” No court, he argued, had ever upheld Congress’ use of its subpoena power to obtain the personal papers of a sitting president. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Reliance Standard Life Ins. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Article 37 of the UCMJ prohibits such commanders from using their rank and position to unduly influence the course of the trial, the witnesses or the accused, the judge or panel members, and the prosecutor and defense counsel. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
This judicial response was, of course, the standard one before the 1993 Daubert decision, but Justice Blackmun’s opinion kept it alive in frequently quote dicta: “Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
” The court cited Greenlaw v. [read post]
